Tags
Bill Compton, clues, Eric Northman, links, Minisodes, Pamela Swynford de Beaufort, Season 5 Theories and Speculation
A couple of weeks ago IBDb ‘disappeared’ recently posted ep titles under the Season 5 heading and replaced them with a link to ‘Bill Minisode’ under new heading ‘Unknown Season’. Check it out:
Then head over to read the original minisode post, written by the lovely pennydreadful. Maybe the TB PTB are trying to tell us something with this bit of cheek–seems too random to be the work of a vandal– maybe not. BG worries this is a clue Bill will propose to Sookie again, and I, intermittently the optimist, speculated that they might have finally decided to remind us of Bill’s true colors.
What say you? This isn’t the first time online TB resources have been pulled.
By the way, officially/unofficially the episode titles for season 5 thus far:
5.03: It’s New Year/It’s a New Year [?]
And how about the latest casting calls, which hint of flashbacks to 1905 San Francisco? Will this be Pam and her origin story as a vampire child of Eric Northman?
Discuss!
Reprinting what I said at TAP…..
The title of 5:03, It’s New Year or It’s a New Year is interesting. IF 5:01 begins with the mortally wounded Tara on Halloween night, then 2 months approximately from 5:01 to 5:03, pass to Jan 1st. That is, if they are referring to the calendar “New Year”.
However, we don’t know if it could be some other kind of new year. For some reason that supposed 1 year jump referenced and stressed a couple of times by various characters, at the beginning of S4 is now bugging me more. Couple that with the Bill minisode.
I can’t really say alarm bells are dinging, but suspicions are rising.
The minisode does most certainly show Bill for the sociopath he is. The short con as opposed to the longer con on the Chicago couple.
I just can’t wondering now after reading many discussion about S4, if it was in fact a massive delusion, both on the viewer and Sookie of course. How TB will explain the delusion I haven’t a clue, if that’s what it was. I’m hedging my bets because it’s so far out there and as osterby pointed out, been done before and in prime time.
But the audience for Dallas bought the premiss of a previous year being bad dream. So there is precedence.
Oh well, it’s not the first time I’ve jumped on the crazy train.
The minisode does most certainly show Bill for the sociopath he is. The short con as opposed to the longer con on the Chicago couple.
Exactly.
I just can’t wondering now after reading many discussion about S4, if it was in fact a massive delusion, both on the viewer and Sookie of course. How TB will explain the delusion I haven’t a clue, if that’s what it was. I’m hedging my bets because it’s so far out there and as osterby pointed out, been done before and in prime time.
It’s been done but the difference with TB is that nobody suspects it’s even possible. That’s where the shock factor will come in. Even my own son, no dummy he, can’t believe a show about butt naked hicks fucking vampires and everything else in sight is about anything more than sensationalism. I can’t wait to see the look on his face when the shizz REALLY hits the fan.
“Oh well, it’s not the first time I’ve jumped on the crazy train.”
Thank you for keeping me company.
Maybe only a portion of S4 was the delusion. Is Nan still dead, is Tara mostly dead?
The San Francisco flashback might be Pam. But we’ve been led up that garden path many times before. Recall the paths that led us to believe it would be Eric we saw in a flashback to Spain, even to pictures of his quilted leather jacket evoking the time period.
If Pam is recalling the night she as a coke sniffing hooker was made vampire, the dangerous man soliciting her could be similar to the situation Tara/Toni was in with the wanna be Russell. That’s a convoluted sentence but YKWIM?
Maybe only a portion of S4 was the delusion. Is Nan still dead, is Tara mostly dead?
This is a good question and one I’ve been pondering since I made up my mind that s4 WAS a delusion/hallucination. I really don’t have an answer. I see two possible scenarios:
1. Was Sookie in down in Bill’s basement in suspended animation the whole time and everything we saw was an dream delusion based on prior events? We’ve all noted the many repeated scenes throughout s4, ranging from the bullet sucking down to chanting in a circle around a fire and myriad others in between. If Sookie was in a drug induced coma it’s possible Tara was never shot at all but merely served as a representation of the images and trauma of Gran’s murder, which was also represented in the dead guard in Bill’s dungeon.
2. On the other hand, Sookie could be walking around in reality but in a trance/dissociative state. In which case, everything we saw happen actually did occur but Sookie’s perceptions of the events were distorted beyond recognition. In which case, Tara actually got shot but how it all went down was deceptively portrayed. Alternatively, maybe Sookie actually DID see that particular event , and a few others, as it actually occurred. In the case of Tara’s shooting the lack of response from Lafayette, upstairs in Sookie’s bedroom, would then have to be accounted for.
It’s all too much to be coincidental, and the relentless gaze of the distorted s4 lens can’t be explained by incompetence. It has to be a scenario like the two above, or something very similar.
Just trying to work out which scenario works best. I’m not even sure which one I prefer. I suppose I prefer it if Tara actually did get shot because that could lead into the speculated plot thread involving Patrick as handler of Terry as mind controlled assassin, which could conceivably lead to the revelation that he is being manipulated by the OTBB [One True Big Bad] into killing troublemakers.
I do think some of the scenes were reliable in the way they were presented. I think a good rule of thumb is this: If Pam, Eric, Tara, Sookie [basically any character who could cause trouble for Bill] are in a scene and they are comfortably IN CHARACTER, the scene is reliable. The converse is true in that any OOC behavior out of troublemakers automatically labels a scene Billshit. [see: Bullet Sucking Scene for reference] As for Nan, I would guess since Eric was quintessential Eric in that scene Nan was staked in precisely the manner it was shown.
ON THE OTHER HAND–pulling back the lens a bit, does this mean Sookie came out of her dissociative state there at the end, or did someone else take over the narrative in the last few minutes of the finale? What if NONE of it ever happened and the flashes of clarity were simply Sookie’s comatose mind feebly fighting against a tidal wave of delusion? We’ll have to look for clues to a change in narrator to say for sure but I really don’t recall a telltale first person camera shot, which always indicates a guest-star narrator, at any point in season 4. Which is saying a lot, because either way, coma or dissociative, it was all Sookie.
Whoa, tough choices.
“What if NONE of it ever happened and the flashes of clarity were simply Sookie’s comatose mind feebly fighting against a tidal wave of delusion?”
The flash that she had of Gran on the floor the last episode of S4, what if she has vaguely remembered something that would implicated Bill in Gran’s death? The reaction she has to Tara’s shooting is the real reaction she had to Gran dead on the floor.
OR…she has the flash of Gran and recalls something and then to traumatize her further, Tara is shot, therefore burying the memory again.
I’ve just revisited the original mini episode and comments here, it’s an interesting conversation.
The mini episode reminded me a bit of the scene where Bill glamours Portia.
If they do decide to make a new mini episode and not just show the old one, how much of it will be based around some of the perceptions of Bill that are being aired on the web?
If they just want to remind everyone of the episode, what exactly is their agenda?
Who knows what their agenda is anna? Is it a prep for the fall of Bill Compton or something else?
Taking into account sunny’s previous post on “It’s Just True Blood”, how many times have we seen politicians, religious leaders, sports stars involved in scandal and they are still in the public eye plying whatever they want.
@anna–”what exactly is their agenda?”
If there even is an agenda. Maybe I’m over thinking this, and it’s such a small thing really, but it’s been up about two weeks now. Plenty of time to take it down. IMDb is the go-to on the web for production info on films and tv. It just doesn’t any make sense that TB/HBO would release ep titles and then allow a vandal to take them down from such a large resource without doing anything about it.
That said, it’s pretty clear the ‘agenda’ is directly relates to Bill. I’ll be the optimist and speculate that his con-artist ways will come into sharper focus in season 5.
But I have a feeling that if this is in fact a clue we’ll see more of the same in coming months.
What’s reasonably clear is that 18 months ago there was far more enthusiasm for the upcoming season and lots of discussion about ethics and motivation.
Now it’s more a question of doubt mixed with sloth and torpor, more a case of “frankly my dear I don’t give a damn” than anything else.
Think I might go for ignorance as one of the main themes for next season,.
I just found your website 2 days ago…and read everything. I had just about given up on watching anymore TB but now ready to rev up again.
I re-watched all of episode 1…closely and so many things are now up in the air and unexplained.
1. Sookie threw Mac Ratray up in the air during her beating. Sook grabbed his leg and threw him up into the top of the trees…and from the camera angle there was someone watching her do this besides Denice Ratray…bill? Right after that bill appeared and finished him off by breaking his neck.
2. When Sookie is getting out of the cab after her failed coffee date with Sam, someone is watching from the bushes low to the ground. From that low camera angle I think it was Sam in his dog form? Sam has a keen sense of smell and that’s why he later followed bill upstairs…he was on the scent of the killer – bill. During that whole time at Gran’s death scene, Sam never left Sookie’s side, I think it was because he knew bill was the killer, but he didn’t want to out his supe nature. bill knew Sam was onto him, that’s why he was so hostile to Sam from then on. Later when Rene is in the kitchen with Sookie he had a flashback of Gran…but it definitely could have been a mind plant from bill. OR…Rene would have used his belt, there was plenty of time because Gran was sitting in a chair. The reason I say this is when Rene is chasing Sookie through the grave yard, his mind goes through all of the girls he’s murdered in the order of their deaths but it skips Gran and goes directly to Amy…because those were his real thoughts Sookie was reading?
This also makes sense of Sam’s reluctance to trust bill in Season 2, when bill wanted Sam to be sacrificed to the Meinad. It also was bill’s opportunity to get his blood into Sam, so the memory of Gran’s true murderer could be buried by bill’s blood control?
BILL KILLED GRAN…all that bullshit bill told Bud Deerborn about vampires unable to resist blood was graphically illustrated in Season 2 when bill and Lorena are humping away while the Chicago woman’s artery is pumping her blood away on the bed next to them. TB made sure we got more than one shot of that blood pumping out…they must have wanted to impress us viewers for a reason. At the end of season one bill is playing the same piano tune that he so enjoyed in his Chicago adventures.
3. Amy said many times that Jason was much more than anyone knew…now that we are heading into Season 5, he does seem to be the only one who recognizes what vamp blood can do to a human. Maybe being simple minded will be the thing a hero needs…so far Jason fits the bill…he’s already done heroic things.
I’m off to watch Season 2…for more details…thanks for letting me post.
I can’t believe I missed it was Sookie who threw Mac Ratray into the tree…really gotta pay more attention…I’m back on TB for season 5…I wouldn’t have been if I hadn’t found you website.
Welcome Hootiecat! What a great comment!
“1. Sookie threw Mac Ratray up in the air during her beating. Sook grabbed his leg and threw him up into the top of the trees…and from the camera angle there was someone watching her do this besides Denice Ratray…bill? Right after that bill appeared and finished him off by breaking his neck.”
SHE DID. I argued this until I was blue in the face, but Sookie did in fact fling Mac into the trees miliseconds before Bill whizzes up. There just is no doubt in my mind.
“It also was bill’s opportunity to get his blood into Sam, so the memory of Gran’s true murderer could be buried by bill’s blood control?”
Possibly, but mostly it was a way of gaining control of one of Sookie’s staunchest allies. Anyone standing in the way of anything Bill wants gets bulldozed.
“BILL KILLED GRAN…all that bullshit bill told Bud Deerborn about vampires unable to resist blood was graphically illustrated in Season 2 when bill and Lorena are humping away while the Chicago woman’s artery is pumping her blood away on the bed next to them. TB made sure we got more than one shot of that blood pumping out…they must have wanted to impress us viewers for a reason. At the end of season one bill is playing the same piano tune that he so enjoyed in his Chicago adventures.”
Oh yes, he did indeed kill Gran. She was in the way and the trauma of her murder worked well to send Sookie straight into his arms. Bill then proceeded to leave bite marks on her neck when he knew there was a serial killer on the loose, targeting fangbangers. We know now he could have healed the bites. Why didn’t he? Why did he deliberately throw Sookie in the line of fire?
“3. Amy said many times that Jason was much more than anyone knew…now that we are heading into Season 5, he does seem to be the only one who recognizes what vamp blood can do to a human. Maybe being simple minded will be the thing a hero needs…so far Jason fits the bill…he’s already done heroic things.”
Jason is a Real Hero with a keen sense of right and wrong. His moral compass is actually far more developed and true than Sookie’s, or most any other character including Hoyt.
“I’m off to watch Season 2…for more details…thanks for letting me post.”
Absolutely! Feel free to post any old time, on any of the old threads you like. I’d be interested to hear your take on any of my theories.
Thanks for the welcome Sunny. I did comment and question on Sookieverse or maybe YouTube blog regarding bill leaving bite marks on Sookie’s neck with a serial killer on the loose in Bon Temp. When it was so easy to remove them for her safety…especially when he was going to be gone for an unspecified time before the Magister.
I was squalling on YouTube during season 2 that Sookie’s beating by the Ratray’s was a set up by bill, that was before I found Sookieverse. I’m southern, and southern gentlemen are never late when dealing with a lady.
One serious question I have is about Sookie’s grandpa Earl. bill had researched Earl too. (the Franklin file) I’m sure bill would have kept tabs on his former neighborhood (note this many re-visits in flashbacks) and would have checked out the strange Stackhouse family. (how old is the Franklin file?)
If Sookie’s trip to Fairy is delusional then it leaves open the possibility that bill killed Earl and kept his watch, made sure Sookie had it for her return trip? To make sure her illusion is more real for her and Jason? That also brings up the fact that Eric could still sense Sookie to some degree. Eric bought Sookie’s house because he knew she was still alive, she did have a small amount of his blood, but maybe where she was was clouded by a fae spell? I think Sookie was under a fairy spell…from Claudine, who bill was controlling after his trip to Fae? I think bill knew where Sookie was all along but he had to plant his political agenda, and maybe Sookie came out of the spell too fast?
Claudine was desperate to get Sookie back to -fake Fairy or bespelled place- before Eric killed her.
Maybe the spell was broken by Sookie’s own fairy power, because her life was in danger. I think Sookie has more powers than we know yet.
Sookie showed tremendous strength when her life was in danger during the Rat beating. Sookie had not had a drop of bill’s blood when she threw Mac into that tree.
One other thing…in S1 Sookie asked bill if he could change shapes, his answer was that some vampires could…but he couldn’t…also he couldn’t levitate.
When QSA threw bill at the beginning of their fight bill landed on the floor at super speed, but the shape was much smaller than a vampire of bill’s size and of course he levitated. More lies…yep.
@Hootiecat
It was revealed in the season 1 commentaries that Sookie had Claudine’s assistance during the Rattray beating.
I supspect that Bill’s ‘Stackhouse’ file goes way back to the time when he was human.
Bill keeps mementos of his conquests…the fact that he kept Grandpa Earl’s watch is very plausible theory.
I suspect that the reason we have been shown Bill levitating is a clue to the viewer that Bill is not an honest vampire.
I would invite you to read Renee’s posts over at TBU’s sister site ancientpythoness.com. Many of the themes you have brought up have been addressed there. I would encourage you to search for the bat boy Bill post.
I think bill knew where Sookie was all along but he had to plant his political agenda, and maybe Sookie came out of the spell too fast?
Her house was finished the very day she returned. Now who would know to time it just right?
well I think your speculations could be something, but do you seriuosly think the writers are that thoughtful, after sesaon 4 the only thing I see on true blood are the massive amount of plotholes, I just cannot be that optimistic anymore… And the way the writers always talk in their “inside the episode” about Bill and how they talk about eric being the bad guy makes me think that the writers seem to be really in the consensus that beel is the tragic hero of the show… not want to be offensive, but I think these speculations are more like wishful thinking…
Hi tint, welcome and thanks for commenting.
“not want to be offensive, but I think these speculations are more like wishful thinking…”
I’m not offended, and believe me I’ve considered the possibility. But I feel confident that most of my theories are well founded and supported. Here’s a bit of proof for that assertion:
http://sunnynala.wordpress.com/2010/04/30/i-smell-a-ratt/
“do you seriuosly think the writers are that thoughtful, after sesaon 4 the only thing I see on true blood are the massive amount of plotholes, ”
I do believe the writers–professionals all–are that thoughtful. I’ve written numerous posts on the plotholes and given sound reasons for their existence.
“the way the writers always talk in their “inside the episode” about Bill and how they talk about eric being the bad guy makes me think that the writers seem to be really in the consensus that beel is the tragic hero of the show”
Nah, there is a reason you [and most everyone else] believe Bill is the bad guy and Eric is [mostly] good–because this is how the writers wrote the characters. They are not blind to their own creations. They talk like that off-script because it’s all part of the game AB has devised; a game that closely follows the techniques of mass media propaganda.
Welcome back Sunny! **wink**
I find myself troubled with this. It’s supposed to be the Sookie show not the Bill show. I don’t know if I like seeing more Bill narrative right off the bat. It is of the utmost importance to get off the Bill kool-aid right away. If not there won’t be a season 6. People are not going to stick around for more of the same. Especially if Eric is going to be Robin to Billman. Season 4 was supposed to be the season where they showed off! Instead people are disppearing like roaches when the lights turn on. We NEED the lights turned on. We need see the real for the real.
Jerron, I agree with you but I don’t think this is a clue to a continuation of the ‘Bill narrative’. I think it means we’re in for a more realistic narrative, one that shows Bill for what he is.
As for it being the Bill Show, I think this is the case only insofar as all of the lies and bullshit can be traced back to him. He has the Means= glamour, V, magic; Motive=power and self-aggrandizement; and Opportunity=mind control of the narrator Sookie–to control what we see. Wresting the narrative from his cold dead hands would mean an entirely new and different True Blood.
But even the minisode is “foggy” for those who wish to remain in the fog. I don’t know. I guess I am not looking forward to season 5 I hope the spoilers change that.
Yeah see, I’ll never understand what’s so foggy about it. A viewer of that minisode REALLY has to stick their head in the sand not to see what Bill did there. It’s as close to a narrative head-clubbing as we’re likely to get. Another example is the Psycho shower scene, which a small segment of the fandom thought was hot.
while all I could see was a psycho murderer/rapist attaching himself to his poor victim like that face alien Sookie mentioned.
I know Sunny I know. Even as I went back and re-read the original posting to see some people give Bill the benefit of doubt is head scratching.
Jerron, some were not only giving Bill the benefit of the doubt they were knowingly defending his actions..
Update—Despite ep titles, casting calls etc, IMDb still has the minisode listed under ‘Unknown Season’.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0844441/episodes
Too weird.
The notice for the Bill minisode seems to be gone as of today, Dec. 7th.
That’s weird. Now it doesn’t even have a heading much less any attempt to list ep titles.
Wow! Great observation you have there. I agree with Jerron, I am definitely puzzled by what is going on with Bill. True Blood is full of twists and turns, that what keeps me so interested! Thanks for sharing this.
OK, I’m trying to get back in the loop. For some reason during the past few days my excitement about True Blood has rebounded. I just read what @Janina (Luna) on Twitter wrote: “Another night of pretending it’s not freezing in Bon Temps!” But shouldn’t it be freezing in Bon Temps? I know Janina is probably referring to the cold weather while filming in L.A. (don’t laugh, 41 is cold for us natives!), but you’d think the *characters* would be dressed for it. People in town were starting to dress warmer, I mean after all, it’s basically November 1st, right? I’m probably totally reading too much into her tweet, it’s not like she wrote she’s wearing shorts and a halter top. But it did get my mind racing.
OH! And “Hi” everyone! Missed you all like CRAZY! I’ll try to get over to TAP soon too! xoxo!
Hey!! So glad glad to ‘see’ you!
IDK Bella. It’s common down here for temps to be in the 70′s-80′s in late Oct. early Nov. Although in N. Louisiana temps in the 40′s are also possible, so I don’t know what to make of Janina’s tweets. Considering the convoluted timeline and the utter fuckedUPness going on in Bon Temps it might in ‘reality’ be July 4th.
Don’t be such a stranger, girl.
You guys are wussies. Cold is when you go outside and your nose hair freezes.
@sunny ~ You’re right about the temps! Duh! Hell, I had the A/C on last week while decorating the tree! I guess LA and L.A. aren’t all that different.
@bobsgran ~ It’s 72 degrees out right now and I’m bundled up in my robe. Brrrrrr!
Girl, it’s 42 degrees here right now and I feel like I might freeze to death!
@sunny & Bella
I guess I’m used to the cold of our winters. Right now it’s -2 C about 30 F. Never did learn the conversion math.
Now I would have a hard time with the heat and humidity you guys get. At 72F my doors and windows would open and I’d be in shorts and T shirt.
hi sunny, long time no see ^^
have you seen this facebook app’, thought it’s just interesting they took bill as the glamourer
http://www.facebook.com/TrueBlood?sk=app_147745032000036
waddya think ?
Wow, hey Alice! Thanks for pointing that out. Very interesting indeed. ‘become his human puppet’, believe anything he says, do anything he wants. Hmm, hint much?!
yeah…sure only sure i don’t wanna become bill’s puppet and bag of flesh and blood
S,
(eric’s would be something to consider though ehe ^^)
@sunny
Has it ever be established within the TB timeline when the minisode was to have taken place?
Was it supposed to be the same night Bill proposed to Sookie or sometime before?
I know we as viewers are led to believe it’s the same night by Bill and his sham of being late for a date. Yet the last episode of S2 has Sookie getting a dress he bought and the note, presumably the day after the maenad was killed.
Excellent point BG. Clearly he arranged for the dress in advance. The night before, at the very least. Why would he leave the all-important ring ‘purchase’ for the last minute? As for it’s exact placement in the timeline, your guess is as good as mine. The night of the proposal we know Jessica was getting ready to go out at the same time as Bill was, but there is no indication she was present in the house when Mrs. Bushy-Smallwood arrived. I think if they meant for us to believe Jessica was home we would have gotten confirmation, like Bill yelling that he would get the door, or Jessica yelling for Bill to get the door. Something like that.
Ok, I think we might be able to assume Mrs. Bushy-Smallwood’s visit coincided with Bill going home to change before heading out to NOLA to confer with SA. Which compresses that timeline even further.
Thinking about the other minisodes……Sookie’s was the same night as the proposal,
Bill’s ?, Eric and Pam after the maenads death before Bill’s abduction I think, Sam’s the same night the maenad died maybe. Him stomping the bull head then he goes off to find the Mickens and as you mention Jessica.
So there is a mix of timelines, past and present.
Hi Sonny, didn’t know where to leave this comment, I was at Sookieverse and they are speculating on events in the books. I’d like your take on my idea of what is chasing Mr. C.
I think the hound’s of hell are chasing Mr. C.
He is a demon. Maybe what he did is a no-no.
In Club Dead Eric is startled by an answer from one of the low-lifes that were waiting in ambush at a gas station, on the drive home from Jackson Mississippi.
Eric has just escaped from being chained in a silver net, while waiting for Sookie to get out of the bathroom. Sookie busts into the convenience store area where the clerk is getting beat up by these two. Eric steps forward and questions Sonny under glamor.
“Who sent you here?” Eric asked softly.
“One of the Hounds of Hell,” Sonny said with no inflection in his voice.
Eric looked startled. “A member of the motorcycle gang,” I (Sookie) explained carefully, mindful that we had a civilian audience who was listening with great curiosity.
This little tidbit leads me to believe that Eric was startled because of how serious it would be to have the real hounds of hell after them.
Hi hootiecat
I haven’t read the books so I can’t help you with book spec. I will say I hope CH explodes some of her Bill bombs and stops with the retconing of his character. {so I’ve heard}
IMDb now has a season 5 header but still only with the first ep title, no synopsis:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0844441/episodes#season-5
Not sure the June 24 premiere date is accurate.
Waves hello to Sunny. Could you please direct me to the conversation/post/thread about Tara being shot by someone else other than Debbie. I know you had a post about Tara being shot by an outside force. Perhaps Russell. Or better yet, Patrick.
Hey pbt!
I haven’t written a post here at TBU yet about Tara being shot, but we’ve discussed it quite a bit at the TAP forum. I plan to correlate all our info and have a post up this week, so stay tuned!
If you’d like to read our thoughts, go to the TAP forum ‘episode by episode’ and it’s somewhere in the long finale thread, probably starting around page 30, I think.
Thanks, Sunny. I knew I read it somewhere
Alright, I am having an out of body experience here. Falling deeper into the rabbit hole. I did not read it on TAP. I very rarely visit there. Though I read all your posts. OMG, I am losing it. Who else would be posting this?
LOL! It’s very possible I’ve discussed it in the comments here but I have no idea where. I don’t think anyone else has picked up on this but I could be wrong.
The gist of it is, we think Terry is a Manchurian Candidate and Patrick is his handler. It’s too convenient that just before the finale we got a look at what a sharpshooter Terry is. And then in the finale Terry acted REALLY WEIRD when Patrick showed up. At one point he seemed to ‘zone out’ like he’d gone into a trance. We think Patrick—the ghost from Terry’s past that Rene warned Arlene about– is there to ‘handle’ Terry into killing troublemakers and he’s not done by a long shot. All on Bill’s behalf, of course.
I really thought you posted a whole thread about Tara’s not so apparent shooting. Referencing gifs showing the exploding window-in and not out. Zapruder and the whole nine yards. The JFK Conspiracy Theories coming to mind. Except in this case, Tara being our “sacrificial lamb” for even more “spells” for our bad blood boy Bill Compton. That would be the ultimate sacrifice for Bill’s magic. That wuold be some very strong juju indeed. I might be having one of those deja vu moments that I have too often to count.
That is exactly how we discussed it at TAP, gif and all. I think I may have posted the gif here? Let me see…YES. In this thread–I even provided a link to our discussion at TAP:
http://sunnynala.wordpress.com/2011/12/19/look-in-the-mirror-please-what-about-the-womenfolk/#comment-7421
That is the rabbit hole. Thanks. Patrick is the prime candidate. I was wondering if he was connected to Russell rather than Bill. I mean. Debbie and Russell could have been working together to rid the world of the precious fairy vagina. No love loss from either side. I mean Russell didn’t know that he could enter. Bill knows that information. So he would have the fun men just enter and do the deed. Russell being gone for a year and half didn’t know about Eric’s purchase of Sookie’s house and neither did Debbie.
Debbie and Russell could have been working together to rid the world of the precious fairy vagina.
I doubt Russell would WANT to rid the world of a resource that could help him daywalk. To vampires like RE and Bill, daywalking = power.
“So he would have the fun men just enter and do the deed. ”
But the point was to make a patsy out of Debbie. In the same manner as the Kennedy assassination, the real assassin had to stay hidden so that there would be no chance of tracing the crime back to the party ultimately responsible. I don’t know why RE would want Tara dead, but to Bill Tara is an unacceptable risk. She’s too independent minded and asks too many questions.
Ummm, that was gun man.
Lol, that’s how I read it. Funny how the mind works.